5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

hepcatz · Post by **hepcatz** » Sun May 08, 2011 10:14 am

I concur, thanks for the pics of the Corolla!

Wade Chamberlain · Post by **Wade Chamberlain** » Sun May 08, 2011 1:42 pm

Nice pics Hokie! Thanks for sharing.

Here's a vid of my 38.008. I wanted a 37 *SO* bad. Note the difference between my reaction and my son Adam's reaction when we saw the time display. LMAO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjt2ZTv4yfk

FredK · Post by **FredK** » Sun May 08, 2011 1:54 pm

doesn't your grass need cutting?

marklombard · Post by **marklombard** » Sun May 08, 2011 2:49 pm

Nice job Wade!

Sorry Fred.

FredK · Post by **FredK** » Sun May 08, 2011 5:07 pm

I'm good Mark. My new A6's come in Wedenesday. I also like to give Wade a false sense of security the week before Cumberland.

marklombard · Post by **marklombard** » Sun May 08, 2011 5:34 pm

Nice!

kcook · Post by **kcook** » Sun May 08, 2011 7:16 pm

results

https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreads ... erpage=250

BugBomb · Post by **BugBomb** » Sun May 08, 2011 7:33 pm

Please note the results are currently incomplete. The championship sheet is still missing a few people, but it will be updated tomorrow.

eage8 · Post by **eage8** » Sun May 08, 2011 8:20 pm

BugBomb wrote:Please note the results are currently incomplete. The championship sheet is still missing a few people, but it will be updated tomorrow.

John Netzel was on rcomps.

Sorry john

JoeTR6 · Post by **JoeTR6** » Sun May 08, 2011 8:48 pm

38.00? I barely managed a 43.90. Either me or my tires are getting old and slow. I definitely need to drive more and shake off some rust.

Jeremy1026 · Post by **Jeremy1026** » Sun May 08, 2011 8:49 pm

88th. I guess I can't complain for only my 2nd time out.

hepcatz · Post by **hepcatz** » Sun May 08, 2011 9:15 pm

No need to be sorry as indeed I was, although it looks like the index is right unlike the display computer at the event?

eage8 wrote:
BugBomb wrote:Please note the results are currently incomplete. The championship sheet is still missing a few people, but it will be updated tomorrow.
John Netzel was on rcomps.

Sorry john

WRX11 · Post by **WRX11** » Sun May 08, 2011 9:27 pm

On behalf of the organizing team and the lovely head organizer, Mehr, thanks to all of the particpants for being patience, cooperating and making the event successful and enjoyeable.

AJ_RDR_Civic · Post by **AJ_RDR_Civic** » Sun May 08, 2011 11:19 pm

Had fun at the event as always. Was very happy with getting out of there at the time I expected, good to see things go by smoothly. Not too happy I didn't drop any time in my afternoon runs, even though I felt like I had driven better.

My runs. 3rd run in the morning was my best with a 41.52. Though my very last run was just 1 hundredth of a second slower with a 41.53. I'm consistant as hell, but that's not fast lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOlUZ5bIMuk

Here are Brian's first 3 morning runs. Did pretty well for shaking the cobwebs off lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybB9u32WYOY

And here are John's first 3 morning runs in his '11 STi. It was his first time and I was giving some pointers. His fastest run of the day ended up being the 3rd run in the morning with a 46.72. Pretty upset that the shot outside of the car is washed out.. Thought this camera setting would be better but apparently not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ojmXctBIGg

BugBomb · Post by **BugBomb** » Mon May 09, 2011 7:45 am

hepcatz wrote:No need to be sorry as indeed I was, although it looks like the index is right unlike the display computer at the event?

I corrected the results very shortly after Mike posted that, so you probably didn't see the incorrect index it had for you. I think it said you were C131S before.

ProDarwin · Post by **ProDarwin** » Mon May 09, 2011 7:55 am

Had fun at this event. It's the first chance I've had to see the new timing system from the computer... Joe truly did a great job. I love the real-time display anyone can walk up and check.

AJ_RDR_Civic wrote:3rd run in the morning was my best with a 41.52. Though my very last run was just 1 hundredth of a second slower with a 41.53. I'm consistant as hell, but that's not fast lol.

Good run! Got me in pax by 0.1s

And for reference, Karwan's pax was another 1.5s faster (WTF?)

hepcatz · Post by **hepcatz** » Mon May 09, 2011 8:20 am

Cool, thanks Mike. Not suprised as usual you were fast & on top of formulating the results.

BugBomb wrote:
hepcatz wrote:No need to be sorry as indeed I was, although it looks like the index is right unlike the display computer at the event?
I corrected the results very shortly after Mike posted that, so you probably didn't see the incorrect index it had for you. I think it said you were C131S before.

eage8 · Post by **eage8** » Mon May 09, 2011 10:33 am

ProDarwin wrote:Had fun at this event. It's the first chance I've had to see the new timing system from the computer... Joe truly did a great job. I love the real-time display anyone can walk up and check.

AJ_RDR_Civic wrote:3rd run in the morning was my best with a 41.52. Though my very last run was just 1 hundredth of a second slower with a 41.53. I'm consistant as hell, but that's not fast lol.
Good run! Got me in pax by 0.1s And for reference, Karwan's pax was another 1.5s faster (WTF?)

haha yeah, you only got me by 1 second for pax... I think something is wrong with the SMF pax haha

(my car is completely under prepped for SMF)

I also like how SMF is closer to STR in PAX than it is in small bore index...

ProDarwin · Post by **ProDarwin** » Mon May 09, 2011 10:53 am

eage8 wrote: (my car is completely under prepped for SMF)

To be fair, AJ's Civic isn't a spec 89 Si, and Mark's Miata isn't an S2K, NC, or NB, so using pax is a tad flawed anyway.

soviet · Post by **soviet** » Mon May 09, 2011 12:01 pm

Bowie lot is awesome. I also have a ton of pictures, will post them up tonight.

AJ_RDR_Civic · Post by **AJ_RDR_Civic** » Mon May 09, 2011 12:12 pm

ProDarwin wrote:Had fun at this event. It's the first chance I've had to see the new timing system from the computer... Joe truly did a great job. I love the real-time display anyone can walk up and check.

AJ_RDR_Civic wrote:3rd run in the morning was my best with a 41.52. Though my very last run was just 1 hundredth of a second slower with a 41.53. I'm consistant as hell, but that's not fast lol.
Good run! Got me in pax by 0.1s And for reference, Karwan's pax was another 1.5s faster (WTF?)

You pulled off a real nice last run. Eh yeah using SCCA PAX but you got me on CDC's Index. And yeah, Brian's numbers are crazy lol.

eage8 wrote: haha yeah, you only got me by 1 second for pax... I think something is wrong with the SMF pax haha (my car is completely under prepped for SMF)

I also like how SMF is closer to STR in PAX than it is in small bore index...

ProDarwin wrote:
eage8 wrote: (my car is completely under prepped for SMF)
To be fair, AJ's Civic isn't a spec 89 Si, and Mark's Miata isn't an S2K, NC, or NB, so using pax is a tad flawed anyway.

Yeah give me ~3 seconds on top of the ST PAX then we'll talk lol. Damn spec civics

eage8 · Post by **eage8** » Mon May 09, 2011 12:45 pm

AJ_RDR_Civic wrote:Yeah give me ~3 seconds on top of the ST PAX then we'll talk lol. Damn spec civics

haha! does that mean I get a -3 seconds on the SMF PAX because of Brian Karwans

soviet · Post by **soviet** » Tue May 10, 2011 4:11 am

here are my photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54399937@N ... 705913897/
all heats except 2

couple of gems in there, including this one

mdbhokie · Post by **mdbhokie** » Tue May 10, 2011 6:49 am

soviet wrote:here are my photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54399937@N ... 705913897/

Thanks so much for the pics of my silver '08 STI! They are great!

WRX11 · Post by **WRX11** » Tue May 10, 2011 8:19 am

soviet wrote:here are my photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54399937@N ... 705913897/
all heats except 2

couple of gems in there, including this one

Great shots!

Capital Driving Club Discussion Forum

5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD

Re: 5/7 CDC AX at Bowie, MD